Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #2686, comment 2
- Timestamp:
- 04/06/2017 05:15:44 AM (8 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #2686, comment 2
initial v1 3 3 I think this mostly happens in some-what long tail searches where there are fewer big players. The advantage also isn't enormous, but it is present. 4 4 5 My suggestion isn't so that plugin creators would resort to ask for more ratings, I'm not in favor of that. But instead, it's so that a having a very few number of ratings - maybe by the author themselves, maybe a friend or a handful of testers or early adopters - won't result right away in an advantage. That's why I mentioned a cut off like 20 ratings (I just pulled that number from the top of my head). My logic is that if a plugin has lower than 20 ratings, the overall rating should have a lower impact than others with 20 or more ratings. 5 My suggestion isn't so that plugin creators would resort to ask for more ratings, I'm not in favor of that. But instead, it's so that a having a very few number of ratings - maybe by the author themselves, maybe a friend or a handful of testers or early adopters - won't result right away in an advantage. That's why I mentioned a cut off like 20 ratings (I just pulled that number from the top of my head). My logic is that if a plugin has lower than 20 ratings, the overall rating should have a lower impact than others with 20 or more ratings. But it doesn't mean that having 300 ratings should always trump a plugin that has 50 ratings. After 20 ratings, then we can assume that the overall rating has normalized to a stable value. 6 6 7 7 For example: