Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
#3065 closed enhancement (fixed)
Add Gutenberg to WordCamp Sites
Reported by: | jorbin | Owned by: | coreymckrill |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | Priority: | normal | |
Component: | WordCamp Site & Plugins | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description
Let's increase the dogfood that we eat.
Change History (8)
#2
@
7 years ago
- Owner set to coreymckrill
- Status changed from new to accepted
- Type changed from defect to enhancement
@andreamiddleton I don't think the added maintenance burden would be that big, simply because it's being worked on so much right now by Core people and other trusted developers. Bugs and security issues get fixed quickly. The biggest issue would probably be keeping it up to date since there is a new release almost every week.
#3
follow-up:
↓ 4
@
7 years ago
Could it be done as an svn external to http://plugins.svn.wordpress.org/gutenberg/trunk/ so that whenever it's updated in the plugin repo, the next deploy of the wordcamp code includes the latest version?
#4
in reply to:
↑ 3
@
7 years ago
Replying to jorbin:
Could it be done as an svn external to http://plugins.svn.wordpress.org/gutenberg/trunk/ so that whenever it's updated in the plugin repo, the next deploy of the wordcamp code includes the latest version?
I was thinking about that after I left my previous comment. It looks like the trunk usually only gets commits at the same time that a new version is tagged, so it should be relatively stable.
#5
@
7 years ago
It looks like the list table links to edit posts using Gutenberg are added for every post type. Most of the custom post types on WC sites (speakers, sponsors, sessions, tickets, attendees, etc.) use a lot of meta boxes that aren't available in the Gutenberg UI. And many a couple of them also don't really use post_content
. We would probably want to add a filter or something that would limit Gutenberg to posts and pages.
#6
@
7 years ago
Cross-linking @jorbin 's pull request: https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/pull/2528
I like the idea of facilitating organizers' using Gutenberg, but would this add to the WordCamp.org maintenance burden?