Don't warn on numbered placeholders <=> non-numbered placeholders

[dd32]

• Some locales use numbered placeholders to change %s to %s into %2$s ba %1$s that shouldn't generate a GlotPress warning
• Some originals use numbered placeholders such as %1$s to %2$s and translations simply use %s ba %s as long as the formats are in order in both and counts match, it shouldn't generate a warning.

Similar to #5154 & #5155

[ocean90]

What’s the point of removing valid warnings just for translate.w.org? They exist for reasons. The second example should definitely be a warning because it’s an incorrect translation.

[dd32]

Replying to ocean90:

What’s the point of removing valid warnings just for translate.w.org?

I would be happy to upstream some improvements there, but your comment proves that it's not always viable either, The majority of the changes I make to translate is to improve the usability of it, rather than be "strictly correct" which the software should be.

However, I don't consider them to be valid warnings, warnings that will always be ignored/discarded are not warnings, they're notices at best.

You'd be correct in thinking that most translators will just fix the translation (because that's their only option other than leaving them), but from what I can see, many with editor rights simply discard them instead (even warnings which should never have been dismissed).

The second example should definitely be a warning because it’s an incorrect translation.

That's debatable IMHO, if it's being used with a printf library, it'll work just fine.

Perhaps a middle ground of agreeing that "upgrading" %s to %1$s shouldn't be considered a warning, but that downgrading is?